Re: Regression in 8.3?

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patric Bechtel <patric(dot)bechtel(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression in 8.3?
Date: 2007-11-12 19:41:20
Message-ID: 20071112194120.GA25723@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:26:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> > on the other hand. while i know and understand why there can't be "="
> > operator for text and int, i think that "like" could be readded as it is
> > really clear about how it works.
> Really?

yes. i still hold my opinion: *int* like *text* is clear.

depesz

--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-11-12 19:42:31 Re: WAL segments size
Previous Message Todd A. Cook 2007-11-12 18:42:23 Re: [HACKERS] Is "query" a reserved word in 8.3 plpgsql?