Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Jeff Trout <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata
Date: 2007-11-04 18:38:52
Message-ID: 20071104103852.5be82d2a@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:28:46 +0100
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > x86_64 is x86_64, regardless of intel or amd.
>
> Not exactly, ask kernel guys ;-). But for user space yes.

For the context of the discussion...

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Zdenek
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHLhG8ATb/zqfZUUQRAgwhAKCbpUKHy+1s8M+spvDrv93Lvw3xUgCffCR6
waU+dYx+RWCRBQBjFGUjvL8=
=q9jd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-04 18:40:42 Re: [HACKERS] AutoVacuum Behaviour Question
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-11-04 18:28:46 Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata