Re: Test lab

From: Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Test lab
Date: 2007-11-03 00:25:40
Message-ID: 20071102172540.7d41701c.markwkm@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:20:27 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > My question is -hackers, is who wants first bite and what do they
> > want :)
>
> Something I'd like to have back real soon is the daily DBT run against
> CVS HEAD that Mark Wong was doing at OSDL. Maybe we don't need a
> particularly enormous machine for that, but comparable runs day after
> day are real nice for noting when patches had unexpected performance
> impacts...

I expect the processors in this system to be faster than what I was using but this system does have about a third of the number of spindles I had previously. In my spare time I am trying to complete a TPC-E implementation (dbt5) to the current spec revision and it is supposed to have significantly less disk requirements than the TPC-C derivative (dbt2) I was using in the past. If we believe TPC-E achieved all its goals, I think it would be appropriate to start using that as soon as the kit is ready.

Anyway want to help with the kit? :) It's the C stored functions that need to be revised.

Regards,
Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-11-03 00:32:29 Re: pg 8.3beta 2 restore db with autovacuum report
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-02 21:13:20 Re: Machine available for community use