Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeff Trout <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata
Date: 2007-11-02 16:23:48
Message-ID: 20071102092348.2f5608f1@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:40:46 -0400
Jeff Trout <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> Asking here since it may deal with clever things such as alignment
> and or binary reps.
>
> I'm migrating from some opterons to some xeons (E5345) both are
> running x86_64. At first I figured I'd need to dump & load my data,
> which will be painful. But on a whim I made a test db on the
> opteron, copied it over (tar) and it fired up and worked fine on the
> xeon. Seeing the success of this, I took our PITR backup and
> restored it properly, and everything seems to be functioning
> correctly from my tests.

x86_64 is x86_64, regardless of intel or amd.

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHK08WATb/zqfZUUQRAtRcAKCoh0UqQJCfCbRltsfdqgaoPpa/SACePsRQ
t3/gNGb9/Lus6JaiVj3yhuA=
=6vs/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-02 16:25:48 Re: minimal update
Previous Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2007-11-02 16:22:50 Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint