| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Date: | 2007-10-22 19:47:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20071022194741.GC13142@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> In fact, I could see doing a "no-catalog-changes, no major patches we don't
> already know about, 6-month release". It would reset our cycle and get
> PL/proxy, DSM, clustered indexes, etc. out the door. It could mean
> turning away patches which look attractive, though, so the whole community
> has to be into this.
Ah, you mean like we planned for 8.0 and failed, then for 8.1 and
failed, then for 8.2 and failed, then for 8.3 and failed? I can
definitely support that idea.
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"We are who we choose to be", sang the goldfinch
when the sun is high (Sandman)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-22 19:47:48 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-10-22 19:37:30 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |