Re: more problems with count(*) on large table

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Date: 2007-10-01 17:12:05
Message-ID: 200710011012.05779@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday 01 October 2007, Mike Charnoky <noky(at)nextbus(dot)com> wrote:
> This is strange... count(*) operations over a period of one day's worth
> of data now take ~1-2 minutes to run or ~40 minutes. It seems that the
> first time the data is queried it takes about 40 minutes. If I try the
> query again, it finishes in 1-2 minutes!
>
> Again, nothing else is happening on this db server except for a constant
> insertion into this table and a few others. I have done "set statistics
> 100" for the evtime field in this table.

The first time, you're reading from disk. The second time, you're reading
from cache. Tens of millions of disk seeks don't come cheap.

--
We're Microsoft. Everything else is just patent infringement.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Trutwin 2007-10-01 17:14:36 Find clusters containing a schema?
Previous Message Mike Charnoky 2007-10-01 17:00:21 Re: more problems with count(*) on large table