Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-04 00:57:33
Message-ID: 20070904005733.GD11274@yellowbank.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein

2007-09-03_16:53:20-0400 Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>:

> Yes, it'll give us a name that's pronouncable and not confusing.

I would guess that the vast majority of communication about the product
is written, not spoken.

I think PostgreSQL looks better, and looks should matter more... ;)

--
Ron Peterson
https://www.yellowbank.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2007-09-04 02:45:44 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Ron Peterson 2007-09-04 00:50:36 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Browse pgsql-de-allgemein by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2007-09-04 02:45:44 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Ron Peterson 2007-09-04 00:50:36 Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)