Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "John Wang" <johncwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-02 05:16:48
Message-ID: 200709020116.49150.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Saturday 01 September 2007 13:57, John Wang wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > That doesnt make it a bad name. There are several very popular
> > > databases
> >
> > that
> >
> > > have SQL in thier name.
> >
> > But none that insist on pronunciations like "Mice Q. L." for "MySQL"
> > or "Microsofts Q. L. server" for "Microsoft SQL Server"
>
> Good point.

*shrug* it's orthogonal to the original posters assertation though.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-09-02 12:19:09 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-02 03:28:05 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)