Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mike Ellsworth <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Date: 2007-08-09 00:45:21
Message-ID: 200708090045.l790jLa20504@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

David Fetter wrote:
> > If people want to make 'no self approval of your or your companies
> > items' a new moderation rule, I have no problem with that.
>
> Good idea. We have enough people and enough diversity that making
> this explicit in the moderation rules is reasonable. :)
>
> Speaking of which, I'd love to figure out a system whereby I can
> avoid (the appearance of) similar conflicts of interest in the
> PostgreSQL Weekly News, as I have been in a position to announce
> things I've done, are doing, etc., and have never felt comfortable
> about it. I guess that's a subject for another thread, though.

Disagree. We are not making policy over one person's suggestion here,
and taken to an extreem, this will slow us down, with zero cases of
conficts actually causing problems. I would prefer people act
responsibly rather than add more rules.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-09 01:07:15 Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-09 00:37:30 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-09 01:07:43 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-09 00:37:30 Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres