Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
Cc: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]
Date: 2007-08-08 17:18:44
Message-ID: 20070808171844.GI20424@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:03:34PM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> Personally, I think expandarray is more appropriate and its
> functionality probably more generally useful, as it identifies the
> array indices as well. Note you can also rename the columns.

Sure. My point is that we should have a way to convert arrays to sets
and back in the backend.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2007-08-08 17:29:43 Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-08 17:07:19 Re: GUC for default heap fillfactor