Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches
Date: 2007-05-01 22:02:29
Message-ID: 200705011502.30844.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom, Josh, Magnus.

> I can't speak to the situation on Windows either; if OpenSSL isn't
> commonly used on Windows that may be a sufficient reason for supporting
> GSSAPI too. I'm just unconvinced by any argument that suggests we'll
> replace our SSL support with it.

I can't imagine we will either. I think we should offer users choices,
within reason.

> IIRC we had a gnutls patch offered, but rejected.

Darn, this happened while I was offline. I would have supported it. I
still think it's a good idea, pending patch quality.

> > Also, last I checked OpenSSL didn't ship with Windows and Kerberos
> > encryption did.
>
> How long ago did you check? I've been using OpenSSL on windows for many
> years. Actually, it was supported just fine on Windows back when it was
> added to PostgreSQL *at least*.

I didn't say *available for download*, I said *ship with*. That is, does a
Windows Vista Pro box from the factory come with OpenSSL on it? It does
come with Microsoft SSPI, although I don't know compatibility issues.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-05-01 22:05:30 Re: temporal variants of generate_series()
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-05-01 22:01:46 Re: Where to find kind code for STATISTIC_KIND GEOMETRY?