Re: postgresql vs mysql

From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
Date: 2007-03-04 13:53:16
Message-ID: 20070304145316.6a6ecba5.adsmail@wars-nicht.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:49:06 +1300
"Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> > That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
> > as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
> > scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
> hits, too, I believe.

Wikipedia is, like ./, heavily cached. Almost every answer you get
comes from a proxy, not from the database itself.

Kind regards

--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
(Ferenc Mantfeld)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Schonefeld 2007-03-04 14:30:28 xpath and xml namespaces
Previous Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2007-03-04 13:44:25 Re: postgresql vs mysql