From: | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql vs mysql |
Date: | 2007-03-04 13:53:16 |
Message-ID: | 20070304145316.6a6ecba5.adsmail@wars-nicht.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:49:06 +1300
"Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> > That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
> > as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
> > scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
> hits, too, I believe.
Wikipedia is, like ./, heavily cached. Almost every answer you get
comes from a proxy, not from the database itself.
Kind regards
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
(Ferenc Mantfeld)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Schonefeld | 2007-03-04 14:30:28 | xpath and xml namespaces |
Previous Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2007-03-04 13:44:25 | Re: postgresql vs mysql |