| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Subject: | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Date: | 2007-02-11 10:59:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20070211105955.GA2703@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:20:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do
> agree with adding a test when you think it is likely to be able to catch
> a whole class of errors, or even a specific error if it seems especially
> likely to recur, but right now I'm not seeing how we do that here.
Well, currently the regression tests only make a handful of functional
indexes, and never insert any data into any of them. So arguably
there's a benefit to just adding a handful of inserts and updates
somewhere to test these. That a whole area of code not currently
tested.
In my memory I remember a site that displayed the code coverage of the
regression tests, but I can't find it now. Does anybody know?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-02-11 11:36:25 | wishlist items .. |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-11 09:34:51 | Re: Priorities for users or queries? |