Subject supressed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Subject supressed
Date: 2007-02-07 19:34:35
Message-ID: 200702071934.l17JYZp19625@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:33 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > Is a test going to get added to the regression tests to catch similar
> > regressions in the future?
>
> While we can modify the regression tests to catch this specific problem
> in the future, I wonder if there ought to be more testing of security
> releases in the future. When a problem is reported, fixed, tested, and
> the resulting security fix is publicly distributed all without public
> discussion (e.g. on the -hackers list), that sounds like an invitation
> to introduce regressions to me.

Uh, did you have to post with this subject line just as 8.2.3 was being
released:

Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

Trying to give us heart-attacks? :-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2007-02-07 19:34:52 Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-07 19:30:30 Re: Status of autovacuum and the sporadic stats failures ?