| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Date: | 2007-01-24 21:08:52 |
| Message-ID: | 200701242208.53198.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> sure that ISP is a bit stupid(especially wrt plpgsql) - but tsearch2
> in the current version is actually imposing some additional(often
> non-trivial) complexity for things like database restores and
> upgrades so I can see an ISP wanting to avoid that altogether.
I have never used tsearch2 across an upgrade, so what exactly are those
problems and why would they be specific to tsearch2?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-24 21:15:12 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-01-24 20:39:49 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-24 21:15:12 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-01-24 20:39:49 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |