| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Date: | 2007-01-24 21:38:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20070124213824.GC26006@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I wrote:
> >> The closest I could find is Oracle Text, the full-text search for
> >> Oracle.
> >
> > Oh, and note that Oracle Text is an "extension" and not included in the
> > Oracle database product proper.
>
> Cool. Then we will have yet another reason to claim we are superior.
It's probably separate just so they can charge extra for it ;-) In our
case it's going to be free either way.
In any case, I agree with Andrew that it would be pretty dumb to reject
a funded, already written patch. If people had a problem with
integrating tsearch2 in core they should have said so much earlier.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-24 21:53:39 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-24 21:30:46 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-01-24 21:53:39 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-24 21:30:46 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |