| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql commandline conninfo |
| Date: | 2006-12-12 22:52:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20061212225229.GD10037@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:44:07PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Now I look at fe-connect.c more closely, I'm tempted just to try parsing
> the dbname param as a conninfo string, and if it doesn't work fall back
> on a plain dbname. I could greatly reduce the chance of following the
> failure path by just looking for an = but I think anything more is
> likely to be redundant.
Does that mean that:
psql -d "service=myservice"
should Just Work(tm)? That would be nice.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-12 22:56:36 | Better management of mergejoinable operators |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-12-12 22:44:07 | Re: psql commandline conninfo |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-12 23:02:12 | Re: psql commandline conninfo |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-12-12 22:44:07 | Re: psql commandline conninfo |