Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Albert Strasheim <fullung(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Subject: Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types
Date: 2006-12-10 20:22:41
Message-ID: 200612102122.42757.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Albert Strasheim wrote:
> Agreed. Some variables I had wanted to make tinyints could be
> expressed as enumerated values. Other variables I wanted to express
> as unsigned ints or tinyints or unsigned tinyints to model the
> possible values
> from the problem domain as succinctly as possible.

Then use domains.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-12-10 21:13:59 Re: BUG #2802: Feature request: tinyint and unsigned types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-10 20:22:37 Re: BUG #2820: "select" faling with "distinct" clause on a subquery