From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bucky Jordan <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |
Date: | 2006-10-13 17:30:24 |
Message-ID: | 20061013173024.GE28647@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:23:31AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Right. And I think the sane ideas are along the lines of estimate & cost
> corrections (like Tom is saying).
Let me ask this... how long do you (and others) want to wait for those?
It's great that the planner is continually improving, but it also
appears that there's still a long road ahead. Having a dune-buggy to get
to your destination ahead of the road might not be a bad idea... :)
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-13 17:33:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-13 17:24:52 | Re: ./configure argument checking |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-13 17:33:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-10-13 17:23:31 | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |