Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Bucky Jordan <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal
Date: 2006-10-13 17:30:24
Message-ID: 20061013173024.GE28647@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:23:31AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Right. And I think the sane ideas are along the lines of estimate & cost
> corrections (like Tom is saying).

Let me ask this... how long do you (and others) want to wait for those?
It's great that the planner is continually improving, but it also
appears that there's still a long road ahead. Having a dune-buggy to get
to your destination ahead of the road might not be a bad idea... :)
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-13 17:33:24 Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-13 17:24:52 Re: ./configure argument checking

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-13 17:33:24 Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2006-10-13 17:23:31 Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal