Re: hstore isexists

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hstore isexists
Date: 2006-10-11 22:22:25
Message-ID: 200610112222.k9BMMPM00348@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:00:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
> > > Sorry, I don't know the history of hstore... but if it's brand new, why
> > > are we worried about backwards compatibility?
> >
> > Because it's been available for awhile outside of contrib (namely,
> > on Oleg and Teodor's own site). So there are people using it.
>
> So wouldn't it make sense to document that the old functions are
> depricated so those existing users will stop using them? Maybe the base
> documentation isn't the best place for that... perhaps an UPGRADING
> section.

The source code should mention it --- that's all.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-11 22:24:31 Re: [GENERAL] strange error when inserting via a SRF into a table with a foreign key constraint
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-10-11 22:18:31 Re: Index Tuning Features