| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: hstore isexists |
| Date: | 2006-10-11 20:10:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20061011201044.GP13487@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:04:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >It's possible to create function 'exists' and mention only it in docs.
>
> Good point. Will you do that, or do you want me to?
ISTM it would be better to mention the deprecated version and
explicitly state that it's deprecated.
> >
> >Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>>Before we spring hstore on an unsuspecting world as a contrib
> >>>module, in the interests of good English, is it too late to change
> >>>"isexists" to simply "exists"?
> >>
> >>Sure, we can do it, as long as we aren't worried about adding
> >>incompatibilities for existing hstore users.
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-10-11 20:17:19 | Re: hstore isexists |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-10-11 20:07:49 | Re: Index Tuning Features |