Re: odd variances in count(*) times

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: odd variances in count(*) times
Date: 2006-10-09 21:23:56
Message-ID: 20061009212355.GM72517@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 02:41:07PM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 10/9/06, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> >* Merlin Moncure (mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> >> explain analyze select 5000!;
> >> A: 2.4 seconds
> >> B: 1.8 seconds
> >>
> >> explain analyze select count(*) from generate_series(1,500000);
> >> A: 0.85 seconds
> >> B: 4.94 seconds
> >
> >Try w/o the explain analyze. It adds quite a bit of overhead and that
> >might be inconsistant between the systems (mainly it may have to do with
> >the gettimeofday() calls being implemented differently between Windows
> >and Linux..).
>
> that was it. amd system now drop to .3 seconds, windows .6. (doing
> time foo > psql -c bar > file). thanks...

You can also turn timing on in psql.

And FWIW, RAID5 generally isn't a good idea for databases.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-09 21:26:15 Re: autovacuum not working?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-09 21:18:27 Re: Simple join optimized badly?