Re: Fixed length data types issue

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixed length data types issue
Date: 2006-09-08 10:39:46
Message-ID: 20060908103946.GB5479@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:54:01AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >The encoding is set per-database. Even if you need UTF-8 to encode
> >user-supplied strings, there can still be many small ASCII fields in
> >the database. Country code, currency code etc.
>
> ISTM we should revisit this when we get per-column encoding.

I think that if SQL COLLATE gets in we'll get this almost for free.
Collation and charset are both properties of strings. Once you've got a
mechanism to know the collation of a string, you just attach the
charset to the same place. The only difference is that changing charsets
requires recoding, wheres changing collation does not.

I think it'd just become a special case of the Relabel node.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2006-09-08 10:58:59 Re: Fixed length data types issue
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-08 09:54:01 Re: Fixed length data types issue