From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Harpreet Dhaliwal <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Trigger (Transaction related) |
Date: | 2006-09-01 07:55:07 |
Message-ID: | 20060901075507.GH12644@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:33:55AM -0400, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> Thats OK, but my question is why did the original insert not take place.
> Syntax error was in the select query that is fired as a result of the
> trigger
The trigger is part of the transaction. If the trigger fails, so does
the whole transaction.
It would be kinda silly if a transaction was allowed to succeed even
though not all the triggers were run.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | karthick muthu | 2006-09-01 08:08:01 | argue |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-01 07:52:43 | Re: SPI_execute (result of a select statement) |