Re: SQL92 compliance

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel CAUNE <d(dot)caune(at)free(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: SQL92 compliance
Date: 2006-08-24 06:42:49
Message-ID: 200608240842.50604.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:
> I think it's a big stretch to say that that patch fixes it, since it
> only allows an AS-less target expression to be c_expr rather than
> a_expr as it ought to.

Well, it works for a useful subset. I remember that some other database
did not *allow* the AS, so there were porting troubles, but I don't
remember the details. I'm just saying that it's doable if it's a
necessity for someone.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-24 06:43:54 Re: SQL92 compliance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-23 21:34:36 Re: Deleting Functions