Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-17 16:59:02
Message-ID: 20060817165902.GQ21363@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:48:54PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> This, however, I would find very useful - both as a -hacker and as a
> user. The point is that only confirmed things should be in there, so
> only confirmed things should be returned on searches and whatevr.
> (private not as in not visible to the public, but private as in
> write-controlled)

I've yet to see a bug tracker that doesn't make it trivial to identify
bugs that were marked as invalid (ie: not a real bug). The only
difference is that you actually have to mark them as such. Given the
fairly low volume of non-bugs that come in through the web form, I don't
think marking them will be a big issue (and as I mentioned previously,
it's something that doesn't have to be done by anyone who's a
committer). In fact, having such a system would probably save committers
time, because they could look only at bugs that had been confirmed as
valid by someone else. Right now, every time a non-bug gets filed dozens
of people end up reading the report before they hit delete.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-17 16:59:11 Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2006-08-17 16:58:12 Re: Autovacuum on by default?