Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib

AgentM wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:01 , Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 12 August 2006 07:22, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I am still waiting for someone to tell us that they would use this
> >> capability for a real-world problem.
>
> Notice that if you google "full disjunction" that the first link is
> this project.
>
> You won't find anyone to vouch for it because this is the first
> implementation of full disjunctions in any database. That doesn't
> mean it isn't useful- it means no one is using it because it hasn't
> existed until now.
>
> This is the point where one needs to decide whether PostgreSQL is a
> copier of features from other databases or whether it can lead with a
> few unique features of its own.

OK, that is helpful. Now, does any current user think they will use
full disjunctions? Is that a fair question?

The point is not whether it should work with PostgreSQL, but whether we
ship it in /contrib, or it is on pgfoundry.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +