Re: 8.2 features status

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-10 23:20:33
Message-ID: 20060810232033.GB5399@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby wrote:
> First, +1 on Josh B.'s point about trying out Trac, since it's
> already up and running. Josh D., can you just turn that on? (BTW, is
> trac linked off http://commandprompt.com anywhere? I had to google to
> find it yesterday...)

I just noticed that the code repository on that Trac is broken in more
ways than I had realized. For starters it doesn't seem to have the 8.1
branch or tags (apparently it's out of date).

Doesn't Trac have a CVS plugin? It will just cause confusion to have a
SVN repo that doesn't reflect reality -- which it wouldn't even if it
weren't broken.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-10 23:50:11 Rethinking top plan representation (or, Query vs. UPDATE RETURNING)
Previous Message korryd@enterprisedb.com 2006-08-10 23:03:10 Re: Plugins redux (was Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation