From: | Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
Date: | 2006-08-04 14:40:10 |
Message-ID: | 200608041040.10463.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:37, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > It's a pity that some expectations have been raised about features that
> > we haven't seen patches for, MERGE/UPSERT & recursive queries
>
> Honestly, I've only had four people say it would be nice to have
> hierarchical queries (one of them wasn't even a PostgreSQL user).
> Almost everyone else seems to ask some variation of, "what's a
> hierarchical query and why do I need it?" It's hard to get excited
> about writing a patch no one sees a real need for.
Make that five. I'll bless the day I can get rid of my recursive plsql
functions.
jan
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com
Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-04 14:42:58 | Re: 8.2 features status |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 14:32:27 | Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length) |