Re: 8.2 features status

From: Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 14:40:10
Message-ID: 200608041040.10463.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 04 August 2006 09:37, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > It's a pity that some expectations have been raised about features that
> > we haven't seen patches for, MERGE/UPSERT & recursive queries
>
> Honestly, I've only had four people say it would be nice to have
> hierarchical queries (one of them wasn't even a PostgreSQL user).
> Almost everyone else seems to ask some variation of, "what's a
> hierarchical query and why do I need it?"  It's hard to get excited
> about writing a patch no one sees a real need for.

Make that five. I'll bless the day I can get rid of my recursive plsql
functions.

jan

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser                     jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com

                Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-04 14:42:58 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 14:32:27 Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length)