Re: [HACKERS] Replication Documentation

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication Documentation
Date: 2006-08-02 00:39:08
Message-ID: 20060802003908.GD20401@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> >I don't think this sort of material belongs directly into the PostgreSQL
> >documentation.

Why not?

> It might be interesting to have some links in the external projects area
> for replication, but a section of its own doesn't seem relevant.

I disagree about "having some links". Maybe we should consider adding
this as a section in the external projects chapter, instead of having a
chapter of its own, but "some links" seems a little short on actual
contents.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2006-08-02 00:45:48 Re: Hash indexes
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-02 00:22:17 Re: Replication Documentation

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-02 00:46:58 Re: [HACKERS] Replication Documentation
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-02 00:22:17 Re: Replication Documentation