Re: reply to ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reply to ...
Date: 2006-07-12 04:19:12
Message-ID: 20060712011839.O957@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really
an optional thing for an MUA to follow?

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...
>
> Kmail ignores it
>
>>
>> ----
>> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>> Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
>> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
> --
> === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
>
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-07-12 04:44:29 Re: [PATCHES] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()
Previous Message Joe Conway 2006-07-12 02:38:08 Re: [HACKERS] kerberos related warning