| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: regresssion script hole |
| Date: | 2006-06-19 13:29:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20060619132929.GC4297@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Of course the $64 question is *why* is 8.0 trying to resolve that name,
> particularly seeing that the later branches apparently aren't.
The formatting of the message suggests it is a gethostbyname("''")
doing it. Did any quoting rules change between 8.0 and 8.1 w.r.t. the
configuration files?
I wonder it it'd be worth adding some conditional code around
gethostbyname() calls that warn if the call took longer than say 10
seconds. By printing out that and the string it's looking up you could
save a lot of time confirming if the delay is there or elsewhere...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-06-19 13:31:14 | Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-19 13:21:21 | Re: regresssion script hole |