From: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alternative variable length structure |
Date: | 2006-06-15 02:57:05 |
Message-ID: | 20060615113854.5567.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I assume the conclusion from this email thread is that though the idea
> is interesting, the complexity added would not be worth the saving of a
> few bytes.
I have same understanding about it. Besides the complexity,
there is trade-off between cpu and i/o resources.
Also, there is another approach in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-12/msg00258.php ,
where 2byte header version of varlena is suggested. It is more simple, but
it may double intrinsic text types (shorttext, shortchar and shortvarchar).
I assume it is worth the saving of a few bytes in particular for indexes
on VLDBs, but my patch is still incomplete and needs more works.
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2006-06-15 02:58:53 | Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-06-15 02:56:10 | Re: Alternative variable length structure |