From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | TJ O'Donnell <tjo(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables |
Date: | 2006-06-13 23:19:01 |
Message-ID: | 20060613231901.GT34196@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:24:51PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
> I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
> chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about
> the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge
> topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts. But,
> today I got some feedback stating the opinion that:
> "Postgres performance diminishes with large tables
> (we?ll be going to upwards of hundreds of millions of rows)."
>
> Is this pure speculation, opinion, known fact?
> Does anyone know of measured performance of postgres
> vs. oracle, specifically with very large tables?
You're more likely to run into problems with large fields being toasted
than plain large tables. IIRC Oracle's large object support is better
than PostgreSQL's.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luis Alberto Pérez Paz | 2006-06-13 23:25:35 | Re: How can I retrieve a function result? |
Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-06-13 23:14:38 | Re: How can I retrieve a function result? |