Re: FW: Getting information about sequences

From: "Forums (at) Existanze" <forums(at)existanze(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Getting information about sequences
Date: 2006-05-16 14:31:44
Message-ID: 200605161431.k4GEVQxa018879@auth-smtp.hol.gr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Does pg_dump run in Macintosh?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 16 May 2006 17:22
> To: Forums @ Existanze
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences
>
> "Forums @ Existanze" <forums(at)existanze(dot)com> writes:
> > We are creating a jdbc backup solution that does NOT require the
> > pgdump program.
>
> In heaven's name, WHY?
>
> Do you have any idea how much future pain you are setting
> yourself up for? pg_dump changes with every PG release to
> deal with new features and changes in the system catalogs.
> Read the CVS logs for pg_dump for the past few years, then
> ask yourself if you really want to buy into a comparable
> amount of ongoing maintenance effort.
>
> You'd be way better off just invoking pg_dump as a
> subprocess. If there are specific features you need that
> pg_dump doesn't have (eg, dumping just selected tables)
> consider helping to add them.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-05-16 14:45:42 Re: FW: Getting information about sequences
Previous Message Brandon E Hofmann 2006-05-16 14:23:09 Server/Database/Schema Definitions