| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions |
| Date: | 2006-05-04 21:39:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20060504213934.GG6429@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Why can PLs not handle pseudo-types?
> >
> >No one's done the work to figure out which ones are sensible to
> >support and then add the logic needed to support them.
> >
> PL/Java will handle the RECORD type correctly. I'm just finalizing a
> new, more flexible, type mapping implementation for PL/Java and it
> would be easy to add support for more pseudo types too. But what
> others would make sense?
Ideally, some way to get all kinds of user-defined types. DOMAINs,
too. :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-04 22:07:26 | Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-05-04 21:33:19 | Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq |