| From: | Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, lmyho <lm_yho(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |
| Date: | 2006-04-08 03:37:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20060408033735.GA14698@yi.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
> > >> I don't feel it's a questionable reading of the GPL at all. In fact,
> > >> it's pretty clear and I'm about 99% sure the FSF has commented on this
> > >> as well. It's true that it's unlikely anyone would actually sue Debian
> > >> over it but that doesn't somehow change what the licenses say.
> > >> Additionally, I think supporting GNUTLS would be a good thing for
> > >> Postgres to do even without this issue. I'd also like to see it support
> > >> SASL and a k5login-style user-controllable mapping.
> > >
> > > So, do GPL have this problem linking against OpenSSL as well?
> >
> > Yes, that's why GPL apps like Exim and Courier have explicit license
> > clauses permitting it.
>
> So, it's freeradius that needs the exception then, right?
Good morning Scott, would you like some coffee? :-)
- Tyler
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-04-08 06:20:21 | Re: can we remove this guy from the list? |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-04-08 01:04:43 | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |