From: | Gavin Hamill <gdh(at)laterooms(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. |
Date: | 2006-04-07 19:59:19 |
Message-ID: | 20060407205919.a091da26.gdh@laterooms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:54:21 -0500
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
> Are the same queries getting the same basic execution plan on both
> boxes? Turn on logging for slow queries, and explain analyze them on
> both machines to see if they are.
See reply to Tom Lane :)
> I'd put the old 4 way Xeon back in production and do some serious
> testing of this pSeries machine. IBM should be willing to help you, I
> hope.
They probably would if this had been bought new - as it is, we have
rented the machine for a month from a 2nd-user dealer to see if it's
capable of taking the load. I'm now glad we did this.
> My guess is that this is an OS issue. Maybe there are AIX tweaks that
> will get it up to the same or higher level of performance as your four
> way xeon. Maybe there aren't.
The pSeries isn't much older than our Xeon machine, and I expected the
performance level to be exemplary out of the box.. we've enabled the
64-bit kernel+userspace, and compiled pg for 64-bitness with the gcc
flags as reccommended by Senica Cunningham on this very list..
> Myself, I'd throw a spare drive in for the OS, put some flavor of
> linux on it
Terrifying given I know nothing about the pSeries boot system, but at
this stage I'm game for nearly anything.
> http://www.asaservers.com/system_dept.asp?dept_id=SD-002
Multi-Opteron was the other thing we considered but decided to give
'Big Iron' UNIX a whirl...
Cheers,
Gavin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-07 20:06:02 | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. |
Previous Message | Gavin Hamill | 2006-04-07 19:45:26 | Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. |