Tom Lane wrote:
> Any thoughts about details? My feeling is that we should tie RI
> semantics to btree opclasses, same as we have done for ORDER BY
> and some other SQL constructs, but I don't have a concrete proposal
> right offhand. The btree idea may not cover cross-type FKs anyway.
This means getting rid of SPI usage, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support