From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Backslashes in string literals |
Date: | 2006-02-13 17:25:08 |
Message-ID: | 200602131725.k1DHP8C25526@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> This patch doesn't leave the standard_conforming_strings entry in guc.c
> with the GUC_REPORT flag, which it needs for psql to work right. Should
> I submit one last patch with this fix and the proper "expected"
> regression file? If so, where should I send it? (The hackers list
> won't take a file as big as that patch.)
Oh, I was just going to add the GUC_REPORT when I applied the patch. I
put that email in the patch queue so I would not forget.
I you want, send a mega patch to the patches list,
pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot) One large patch is usually safest to
apply.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-13 17:52:17 | Re: psql & readline & win32 |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-13 17:18:13 | Re: Use cases |