| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Sequences/defaults and pg_dump |
| Date: | 2006-02-09 20:16:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20060209201610.GH7693@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> The only thing we'd lose is that dropping a column
> originally declared as serial wouldn't implicitly drop the sequence.
Wasn't that the primary purpose that the main coder for dependencies did
the work for? AFAIR the fact that the sequence wasn't dropped was a big
gotcha. Everyone was annoyed any time they wanted to experiment with
creating and dropping a table.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike G. | 2006-02-09 20:21:16 | Update table with data from another table |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-09 20:12:02 | Re: [GENERAL] Sequences/defaults and pg_dump |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-09 20:16:29 | Re: Upcoming re-releases |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-02-09 20:13:22 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash |