Re: Upcoming re-releases

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upcoming re-releases
Date: 2006-02-09 20:01:26
Message-ID: 20060209200126.GF7693@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Oh, pah, I'm there already, as 'Snow-Man' and I've heard all about it.
> > > Sorry that Debian/stable releases havn't been coming out as frequently
> > > as they really should have been. We're working on that, honest!
> >
> > The only thing that I hate is that libpq defaults to searching the
> > local socket in /var/postgresql/ or thereabouts. It really drives me
> > crazy and I've banned the libpq packages from my system.
>
> Perhaps /var/run/postgresql/? Where do you think it should go...?

Where the upstream package puts it, /tmp ... But yeah, I know about the
Debian Policy.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-02-09 20:09:32 Re: Upcoming re-releases
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-09 19:59:45 Re: [GENERAL] Sequences/defaults and pg_dump