| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] No heap lookups on index |
| Date: | 2006-01-19 03:11:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200601190311.k0J3BQH05485@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Glen Parker wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>What ever happened to grouped heap reads, i.e. building a list of tuples
> >>from the index, sorting in heap order, then reading the heap in a batch?
> >
> >
> > Done in 8.1. I'm uncertain whether Scott knows about that ...
>
> That's GREAT news! Is that the "Bitmap Scan" item in the what's new
> list (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/whatsnew)? I didn't even notice it
Yes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-19 03:13:10 | Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2006-01-19 03:05:10 | Re: Data type that corresponds to bigserial... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-01-19 03:13:10 | Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-19 03:03:33 | Re: pgxs/windows |