| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Date: | 2006-01-06 17:46:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200601061746.k06Hk1V13082@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > FYI, SQL03 defines GRANT SEQUENCE.
>
> Oh. Well, then that gives us precedent to go by. What do they specify
> as the privileges for sequences?
They don't seem to specify which actions go with which objects in the
GRANT statement, nor do they specify what permissions should control the
nextval-style statements. Seems like something they should have
specified.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2006-01-06 17:47:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-06 17:23:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2006-01-06 17:47:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-06 17:23:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |