Re: insert performance for win32

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: insert performance for win32
Date: 2005-11-04 18:15:43
Message-ID: 200511041815.jA4IFhX16474@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> > Nailed it.
>
> > problem is in mainloop.c -> setup_cancel_handler. Apparently you can
> > have multiple handlers and windows keeps track of them all, even if they
> > do the same thing. Keeping track of so many system handles would
> > naturally slow the whole process down.
>
> Yipes. So we really want to do that only once.
>
> AFAICS it is appropriate to move the sigsetjmp and setup_cancel_handler
> calls in front of the per-line loop inside MainLoop --- can anyone see
> a reason not to?

Nope.

> I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
> performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
> script would probably crash a Windows machine.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-04 18:19:02 Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-04 18:14:36 Re: insert performance for win32

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-04 18:19:02 Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-04 18:14:36 Re: insert performance for win32