Re: Oracle buys Innobase

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: felix(at)crowfix(dot)com, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-08 21:49:45
Message-ID: 200510081849.45507.martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

El Sáb 08 Oct 2005 18:11, felix(at)crowfix(dot)com escribió:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:31:30AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> > What it comes down to is this. MySQL is dual licensed. You can use
> > the GPL version, or the commercial version. In order to sell the
> > commercially licensed version, MySQL must have the rights to all the
> > code in their base. So, in order for MySQL to sell a commercail
> > version of MySQL with innodb support, they have to pay innobase a
> > bit to include it, or rip it out.
>
> I don't understand. If both MySQL and Innodb are GPL licensed,
> commercial or not should make no difference, and they can add all the
> GPL changes they want o the last Innodb GPL release.
>
> What am I missing?

They can't enforce a commercial licence over a GPL aplication.

--
select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;
---------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | Programador, DBA
Centro de Telemática | Administrador
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
---------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-08 21:56:57 Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message felix 2005-10-08 21:11:54 Re: Oracle buys Innobase

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-08 21:56:57 Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-10-08 21:22:23 Re: Dump all except some tables?