Re: Dump all except some tables?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: WireSpot <wirespot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Roger Hand <RHand(at)kailea(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dump all except some tables?
Date: 2005-10-08 01:21:31
Message-ID: 20051008012131.GB36108@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:07:47AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:47:26AM +0300, WireSpot wrote:
> > But... will the resulting dump be consistent as far as foreign keys
> > are concerned? Or will the current -t warning still apply (YMMV as
> > to the consistency of the resulting dump)?
>
> I think the latter is better. This is solidly in the realm of prying
> off cover plates, and the warning is already there :)

I think it would be good to include an option that only does checking
and doesn't actually try to dump anything. That would make it easier to
ensure your config file is correct.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-08 01:26:15 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message Denis Lussier 2005-10-07 22:00:50 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase