Re: Release, 3rd draft

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Lance Obermeyer <LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release, 3rd draft
Date: 2005-10-04 22:05:33
Message-ID: 20051004220533.GH40138@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:00:49PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> > > I don't think we should compare ourselves to the MySQL metric. It
> > > doesn't do us any good. The reality is, MySQL is more popular. There
> > > isn't any arguing that.
>
> Right. However, this removes the whole thrust of the Lance quote. Does
> anyone have a suggestion on what to do with the PR instead?

Well, it only removes part of it; that about our current beta. The last
version clearly showed a trend of increased downloads over the version
before that. Though I agree that the quote loses some of it's effect.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-04 22:15:15 Re: Release, 3rd draft
Previous Message Lance Obermeyer 2005-10-04 22:05:14 Re: Release, 3rd draft