| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural |
| Date: | 2005-09-06 02:34:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20050906023406.GI17945@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:50:49PM -0300, Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural languages,
> as per my recent proposal.
Yay!
> For now the template data is hard-wired in proclang.c --- this
> should be replaced later by a new shared system catalog, but we
> don't want to force initdb during 8.1 beta.
Wouldn't beta be the time to do it? I know we define initdb-forcing
changes to mean a major version bump, but I also thought that beta was
a time to find the places where such changes make sense. Has there
been a guarantee that beta means "no initdb" in previous releases?
Just my $.02.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-09-06 02:42:34 | Re: pgsql: Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-05 23:50:49 | pgsql: Implement a preliminary 'template' facility for procedural |