| From: | Carlos Henrique Reimer <carlosreimer(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql replication |
| Date: | 2005-08-25 19:26:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20050825192657.5098.qmail@web53202.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Exactly!!!!
Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> escreveu:Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Or, for something far easier, try
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgcluster/ which provides syncronous
> multi-master clustering.
>
He specifically said that pgcluster did not work for him because the
databases would be at physically seperate locations. PGCluster requires
that there be a load balancer and a replicator centrally located
managing the cluster. If a network problem happens at the centralized
location, it would bring down all locations completely.
I think he's looking for an async solution because of that. In my
solution, if one location goes down, the others keep going.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matt Miller | 2005-08-25 19:54:49 | Re: Postgresql replication |
| Previous Message | William Yu | 2005-08-25 19:02:05 | Re: Postgresql replication |